We have noted several times that the most glaring error in the forged documents is not the fonts, etc., but the suggestion that in August 1973, "Staudt" was pressuring "Hodges" to "sugarcoat" Lt. Bush's evaluation. "Staudt" is Brigadier General Walter "Buck" Staudt, and the reason why the forged memo is obviously inaccurate is that Gen. Staudt retired from the Texas Air National Guard in March 1972.

One omission from the news coverage of the CBS scandal has been the reticence of Gen. Staudt, who, unlike the memos' purported author, Jerry Killian, is alive and well. General Staudt has now given an interview to ABC News, which apparently will air tonight. Here are the General's comments as reported by ABC today:

"He didn't use political influence to get into the Air National Guard. I don't know how they would know that, because I was the one who did it and I was the one who was there and I didn't talk to any of them."

"He was highly qualified. He passed all the scrutiny and tests he was given."

"No one called me about taking George Bush into the Air National Guard. It was my decision. I swore him in. I never heard anything from anybody."

"He was a well-educated, bright-eyed young man, just the kind of guy we were looking for. He presented himself well. I'd say he was in the upper 10 percent or 5 percent or whatever we ever talked to about going to pilot training. We were pretty particular because when he came back [from training], we had to fly with him." [Ed.: That's a heck of a good point, if you think about it.]

Staudt retired from the Guard in March of that year and said he was never contacted about Bush's performance.

"There was no contact between me and George Bush … he certainly never asked for help," Staudt said. "He didn't need any help as far as I knew."

He added that after retiring he was not involved in Air National Guard affairs. "I didn't check in with anybody — I had no reason to," he said. "I was busy with my civilian endeavors, and they were busy with their military options. I had no reason to talk to them, and I didn't."

There you have it. If CBS had carried out a competent investigation into the documents' authenticity, they would have contacted General Staudt to get his reaction to the statement about him in the August 1973 memo. Had they done so, they would have learned that he had retired well before that date, and would have had to take into account his denial of the allegation in the memo, and of the whole thrust of their report.

Of course, if Dan Rather already knew that the documents were forged, it would explain why he didn't bother to have someone on that crack CBS staff, with all of the "checks and balances" he tells us about, pick up the phone and call General Staudt.

Posted by John at 03:56 PM  |    |  

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/mt/mt-diespammers.cgi/7934

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference General Staudt Speaks:

» Slam Dunk from ModularParrot
There you have it; Dan's on life support.... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 04:25 PM

» Did CBS's Source Call Bush Hitler? from La Shawn Barber's Corner
Can't ignore it, folks. I have to keep you updated on Dan Rather's forged memos. The Houston Chronicle says:If Burkett does prove to be the source of the documents, CBS got them from a man with a well-established history of Bush loathing. In an... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 04:29 PM

» Staudt Speaks from small dead animals
About a week ago, I began to wonder why one person mentioned in the discredited Rathergate memos had not commented on the contraversy. My suspicion is that he may have been seeking legal advice - as far as I can... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 05:27 PM

» Missing in Action from TacJammer
None of the usual liberal pundits were on in the analysis segment of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume tonight. Typically, either Mara Liasson or Juan Williams of NPR (or both) are on the panel. Tonight, neither — nor... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 06:04 PM

» Sorry Dan, Someone Else Broke This Story from Hold The Mayo
Not only have the documents been proven forgeries, but the statements of the one surviving witness named in the memos has pretty thoroughly put an end to the forged but accurate defense. Along the way, he also shreds the whole Ben Barnes influence conf... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 06:40 PM

» Strike Three for Dan from Secure Liberty
His memos were fakes - strike one. Then his witnesses all backed off or contradicted him - strike two. Now a new witness, one who should have been the first witness contacted, refutes the entire story - strike three. Dan, your'e out. In an interv... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 07:43 PM

» Strike Three for Dan from Secure Liberty
His memos were fakes - strike one. Then his witnesses all backed off or contradicted him - strike two. Now a new witness, one who should have been the first witness contacted, refutes the entire story - strike three. Dan, your'e out. In an interv... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 07:54 PM

» Staudt Speaks from small dead animals
About a week ago, I began to wonder why one person mentioned in the discredited Rathergate memos had not commented on the controversy. My suspicion is that he may have been seeking legal advice - as far as I can... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 08:36 PM

» As many others are reporting, from Smiling Kevin's
As many others are reporting, ABC has a story tonight with Brigadier General Staudt. He... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2004 08:44 PM

» Staudt Speaks Out - Memos Fake, Not Accurate from bLogicus
One of many notable discrepencies in the CBS Memos is that they refer to an active role by Col. Walter Staudt despite the fact that he retired 1.5 years before they were written. The memos suggest that Staudt exerted pressure... [Read More]

Tracked on September 18, 2004 09:58 AM