The GOP has announced that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani delivered the following remarks in a Bush-Cheney '04 conference call today. (Deacon refers to the remarks and provides the link below -- click here for the full text of the press release.) Giuliani's remarks are worth quoting at length:

For some time, and including when I spoke at the Republican Convention, I’ve wondered exactly what John Kerry’s approach would be to terrorism and I’ve wondered whether he had the conviction, the determination, and the focus, and the correct worldview to conduct a successful war against terrorism. And his quotations in the New York Times yesterday make it clear that he lacks that kind of committed view of the world. In fact, his comments are kind of extraordinary, particularly since he thinks we used to before September 11 live in a relatively safe world. He says we have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance.

I’m wondering exactly when Senator Kerry thought they were just a nuisance. Maybe when they attacked the USS Cole? Or when they attacked the World Trade Center in 1993? Or when they slaughtered the Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics in 1972? Or killed Leon Klinghoffer by throwing him overboard? Or the innumerable number of terrorist acts that they committed in the 70s, the 80s and the 90s, leading up to September 11?

This is so different from the President’s view and my own, which is in those days, when we were fooling ourselves about the danger of terrorism, we were actually in the greatest danger. When you don’t confront correctly and view realistically the danger that you face, that’s when you’re at the greatest risk. When you at least realize the danger and you begin to confront it, then you begin to become safer. And for him to say that in the good old days – I’m assuming he means the 90s and the 80s and the 70s -- they were just a nuisance, this really begins to explain a lot of his inconsistent positions on how to deal with it because he’s not defining it correctly.

As a former law enforcement person, he says ‘I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never going to end illegal gambling. But we’re going to reduce it.’ This is not illegal gambling; this isn’t prostitution. Having been a former law enforcement person for a lot longer than John Kerry ever was, I don’t understand his confusion. Even when he says ‘organized crime to a level where it isn’t not on the rise,’ it was not the goal of the Justice Department to just reduce organized crime. It was the goal of the Justice Department to eliminate organized crime. Was there some acceptable level of organized crime: two families, instead of five, or they can control one union but not the other?

The idea that you can have an acceptable level of terrorism is frightening. How do you explain that to the people who are beheaded or the innocent people that are killed, that we’re going to tolerate a certain acceptable [level] of terrorism, and that acceptable level will exist and then we’ll stop thinking about it? This is an extraordinary statement. I think it is not a statement that in any way is ancillary. I think this is the core of John Kerry’s thinking. This does create some consistency in his thinking.

It is consistent with his views on Vietnam: that we should have left and abandoned Vietnam. It is consistent with his view of Nicaragua and the Sandinistas. It is consistent with his view of opposing Ronald Reagan at every step of the way in the arms buildup that was necessary to destroy communism. It is consistent with his view of not supporting the Persian Gulf War, which was another extraordinary step. Whatever John Kerry’s global test is, the Persian Gulf War certainly would pass anyone’s global test. If it were up to John Kerry, Saddam Hussein would not only still be in power, but he’d still be controlling Kuwait.

Finally, what he did after the World Trade Center bombing in 1993, where I guess at that point terrorism was still just a nuisance. He must have thought that because that’s why he proposed seriously reducing our intelligence budget, when you would think someone who was really sensitive to the problem of terrorism would have done just the opposite. I think that rather than being some aberrational comment, it is the core of the John Kerry philosophy: that terrorism is no different than domestic law enforcement problems, and that the best we’re ever going to be able to do is reduce it, so why not follow the more European approach of compromising with it the way Europeans did in the 70s and the 80s and the 90s?

This is so totally different than what I think was the major advance that President Bush made – significant advance that he made in the Bush Doctrine on September 20, 2001, when he said we’re going to face up to terrorism and we’re going to do everything we can to defeat it, completely. There’s no reason why we have to tolerate global terrorism, just like there’s no reason to tolerate organized crime.

Posted by Scott at 05:43 PM  |    |  

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/mt/mt-diespammers.cgi/8215

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rudy Giuliani explains...:

» Broken Windows and the Nuisance of Terrorism from Infinite Monkeys
‘’We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,'’ Kerry said. ‘’As a former law-enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 06:09 PM

» Giuliani On the Nuisance of Terrorism from Hold The Mayo
Via Powerline remarks from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani on John Kerry's statements regarding terrorism. A sample before you go read it all:The idea that you can have an acceptable level of terrorism is frightening. How do you explain... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 06:56 PM

» Guiliani speaks from AlwaysRight.org Weblog
Powerline has this post regarding Guiliani's words earlier today on an RNC conference call. [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 07:53 PM

» Rudy Guiliani tells us why Kerry gets it wrong whe from The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill
Powerline outlines how Rudy Guiliani feels about Kerry's article in the New York Times Magazine, where he is quoted wishing to get back to an acceptable level of terrorism. You know where your friend gets beheaded but you don't. This dovetails nicely... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 08:01 PM

» The fallout continues from Media Lies
The incredible statements that John Kerry made in the New York Times Magazine interview will haunt him from now until election day. Powerline blogged a conference call with Rudy Guiliani today in which Guiliani discussed Kerry's interview. Guiliani p... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 10:11 PM

» John Kerry's Remarks on Terrorism Over the Weekend from The Truth Now
Powerline has posted Rudy Guiliani's statement today reviewing John Kerry's interview with the New York Times Magazine. Most of the remarks are in regard to this statement from Senator Kerry: When I asked Kerry what it would take for Americans... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 11:04 PM

» Oh, Bother! from Watcher of Weasels
John Kerry's “nuisance” gaffe should provide the Bush campaign with plenty of fodder for the next few days...  they've already managed to include it in a new campaign ad, and Rudy Guliani used it to make one hell of a... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2004 11:20 PM

» Broken Windows and the Nuisance of Terrorism from Infinite Monkeys
‘’We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,'’ Kerry said. ‘’As a former law-enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never... [Read More]

Tracked on November 4, 2004 10:19 PM

» Broken Windows and the Nuisance of Terrorism from Infinite Monkeys
‘’We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,'’ Kerry said. ‘’As a former law-enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never... [Read More]

Tracked on November 4, 2004 10:21 PM