![]() |
|
November 29, 2004
In 1995 Congress enacted the Solomon Amendment requiring universities to treat military recruiters like other prospective employers on campus as a condition of the universities' receipt of federal funds. Last year the Forum for Institutional and Academic Rights ("FAIR") brought a lawsuit to enjoin the government from enforcing the Solomon Amendment. I compared the merits of FAIR's lawsuit to the merits of the obesity lawsuits -- "slim to none" -- in "Yale vs. U.S. Military, Round 2." Today a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ordered that enforcement of the Solomon Amendment be preliminarily enjoined in a lengthy 2-1 decision; the court's opinion is FAIR v. Rumsfeld. The New York Times reports on the decision in "Court allows universities to bar military recruiters." As my column of last year suggests, I think the Third Circuit decision is absurd. It deserves much further analysis and comment; I intend to return to the subject when I have had time to read the court's decision in its entirety. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Philosophizing disgrace:
» Violation of 1st Amendment rights? from The Loudest Cricket Tracked on December 1, 2004 12:57 PM
» online casino from online casino Tracked on February 1, 2005 01:20 AM |