![]() |
|
December 29, 2004
Evan Coyne Maloney spots something of significance amidst the rantings and false accusations that make up Nick Coleman's Strib diatribe against Power Line. Coleman said: Powerline is the biggest link in a daisy chain of right-wing blogs that is assaulting the Mainstream Media while they toot their horns in the service of ... what? The downtrodden? No, that was yesterday's idea of the purpose of journalism. Maloney responds: That's funny; I always thought the purpose of journalism was to describe noteworthy events, to tell what happened. No, in Coleman's world, the purpose of the media is to "toot their horns in the service of [...] the downtrodden." Of course, they get to decide who's downtrodden, they get to decide how the downtrodden should be served--it always seems to be through the election of liberals or the support of big government programs--and they get to decide what facts to leave out and what details to spin in order to further their goals. Coleman has thus acknowledged that he and his MSM brethren practice the "agenda journalism" Hugh Hewitt described in his Weekly Standard column. Coleman's grievance amounts to nothing more than the fact that people who don't share his agenda can now reach the public, thus forcing him, if he hopes to remain relevant, to defend both his agenda and his shoddy work. HINDROCKET adds: Evan Coyne Maloney wrote us in an email today: I suspect Coleman is getting far more attention by attacking you than he ever would have in his tiny little outlet. If I were conspiratorially minded, I'd think he's purposefully attacking you all just to get some name recognition. I'm afraid that's right. Coleman is a little-read, third-rate columnist for a second-tier daily newspaper. We'll probably do a brief round-up of commentary on this contretemps at some point, but otherwise, we'll treat poor Mr. Coleman as we did his equally obscure colleague Jim Boyd earlier this year: leave him in our rear-view mirror. ONE MORE: Several lawyers have written to offer their services in suing Coleman for defamation. We don't have any present intention to bring such a suit; reader David Tweeten gives one reason why: Sorry. You'll never be able to prove damages in any libel action against Nick Coleman. Though your case is otherwise rock-solid, somehow, you'd have to prove that Coleman's pathetic article hurt your reputations. Unfortunately for you, the only people whose reputations were damaged were Coleman's and the Star Tribune editorial staff's. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nick Coleman's idea of the purpose of journalism:
» Journalism? from Secure Liberty Tracked on December 29, 2004 03:31 PM
» Downtrodden=Brussel sprouts from Preemptive Karma Tracked on December 29, 2004 04:10 PM
» Streaming to the Pickets... from My Sandmen Tracked on December 29, 2004 04:37 PM
» Coleman Gets New Hatchet For Power Line from Vista On Current Events Tracked on December 29, 2004 04:41 PM
» Volokh Criticizes Coleman's Attack On Powerline from Powerpundit Tracked on December 29, 2004 09:19 PM
» Nick who? from sheepdog.blog-city.com Tracked on December 29, 2004 09:21 PM
» You know what guys... from Radio Brian Scott Tracked on December 29, 2004 10:09 PM
» Nick's Meltdown Into Adolescence from StarTribune Review Tracked on December 29, 2004 10:11 PM
» Powerline's Daisy Chain from bLogicus Tracked on December 30, 2004 01:01 AM
» So Nick Coleman, What Are You Compensating For?? from Blogs for Bush Tracked on December 30, 2004 01:37 AM
» The Best Line Of The Day from Late Final Tracked on December 30, 2004 08:05 AM
» Careful, Nick. You're nipping at some powerful ankles there. from Small Town Veteran Tracked on December 31, 2004 12:25 AM
» online poker from online poker Tracked on February 1, 2005 01:13 AM
» online poker from online poker Tracked on February 1, 2005 01:14 AM
» Bill Moyer Slides Completely Off The Deep End from Just Some Poor Schmuck Tracked on February 1, 2005 02:34 AM
» Bill Moyer Slides Completely Off The Deep End from Just Some Poor Schmuck Tracked on February 1, 2005 02:34 AM |