![]() |
|
January 11, 2005
Today's best commentary on the Rathergate Report is Jonathan Last's at the Standard Online: "Whitewash." Last identifies the agnosticism of the report on the documents' authenticity, the failure of the report to investigate the origin of the documents, and the utter credulity of the report on the 60 Minutes story's motivation as key elements of the report that cannot withstand scrutiny. The blatant fraudulence of the Burkett documents should have been the conclusion that was the predicate for a serious investigation of the key issues raised by the 60 Minutes story. The report's failure to draw a conclustion regarding the authenticity of the documents disqualifies it from consideration as a serious document. It is in my view a failure that discredits the report as an exercise in damage control for CBS. In critical respects the report severs its narrative of the 60 Minutes story from the context of the presidential campaign that was its impetus. It fails to follow up on or draw inferences from the producers' email correspondence (noted by Rocket Man here) hypothetically marketing the story's "information that could change the momentum of an election[.]" The report leaves the question of political motivation and bias with the ipse dixit of Dan Rather (who, me?) and Mary Mapes ("proximity, not politics"...how about relocating her to Massachusetts?). Is this some kind of a joke? Did Thornburgh or Boccari think to ask whether Rather and Mapes opposed the reelection of President Bush, or any other follow-up question that might have shed some light on the issue? Apparently not, at least so far as is apparent on the face of the report. Anyone who reads the report with care, cognizant of the context of the 60 Minutes story in the presidential campaign, will find the elements of the report identified by Last to be howlers. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Howlers:
» Four CBS Employees Fired Over Rathergate and "Myopic Zeal" from La Shawn Barber's Corner Tracked on January 11, 2005 08:13 AM
» CBS says "guilty but not biased" from Jeff Blogworthy.com Tracked on January 11, 2005 09:01 AM
» More on Dan Rather from Reagan Republican Tracked on January 11, 2005 09:23 AM
» http://posseincitatus.typepad.com/posse_incitatus/2005/01/powerline_has_a.html from Posse Incitatus Tracked on January 11, 2005 09:36 AM
» Martyrs of the Memogate report from Posse Incitatus Tracked on January 11, 2005 09:37 AM
» Rathergate Wrap-Up and the Howlers from FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog Tracked on January 11, 2005 09:42 AM
» Define Bias from Not So Much Tracked on January 11, 2005 10:57 AM
» Rathergate Report Roundup from Myopic Zeal Tracked on January 11, 2005 12:46 PM
» Self-evident to all but the experts from Petrified Truth Tracked on January 11, 2005 01:26 PM
» Some Heads Roll... from Ipse Dixit Tracked on January 11, 2005 03:01 PM
» Two Americas? by Richard from Epoch3Blog Tracked on January 11, 2005 06:31 PM
» Two Americas? by Richard from Epoch3Blog Tracked on January 11, 2005 06:34 PM
» Two Americas? by Richard from Epoch3Blog Tracked on January 11, 2005 06:37 PM
» Two Americas? by Richard from Epoch3Blog Tracked on January 11, 2005 06:41 PM
» Good Think-Piece on Rathergate from Ace of Spades HQ Tracked on January 11, 2005 07:43 PM |