![]() |
|
February 01, 2005
There has been a lot of buzz about absurd comments made by Eason Jordan, the number one guy at CNN, at the "World Economic Forum" in Davos, Switzerland. Here is how the forum's blog tells the story: During one of the discussions about the number of journalists killed in the Iraq War, Eason Jordan asserted that he knew of 12 journalists who had not only been killed by US troops in Iraq, but they had in fact been targeted. He repeated the assertion a few times, which seemed to win favor in parts of the audience (the anti-US crowd) and cause great strain on others. I suppose a short refutation of Jordan's theory would be that if the U.S. military really set out to "target" journalists in Iraq, there wouldn't be anywhere near so many journalists swarming over that country. I don't have much to add to what has already been said by others about Jordan's wacko claim; Hugh Hewitt has a good roundup. Jordan is the same guy who admitted that CNN sucked up to Saddam Hussein and didn't report what they knew about his regime. So he's a really, really credible source. Could someone please put CNN out of its misery? UPDATE: CNN has sent out an email to several bloggers, including us, that says: Many blogs have taken Mr. Jordans remarks out of context. Eason Jordan does not believe the U.S. military is trying to kill journalists. Mr. Jordan simply pointed out the facts: While the majority of journalists killed in Iraq have been slain at the hands of insurgents, the Pentagon has also noted that the U.S. military on occasion has killed people who turned out to be journalists. The Pentagon has apologized for those actions. This is, of course, quite different from what the Davos blog reported Mr. Jordan saying, i.e., that the U.S. military has "targeted" journalists. Another participant in the Davos event Rebecca MacKinnon (whom I met at the Journalism/Blogger conference at the Kennedy School a couple of weeks ago) says: The official WEF summary does not mention Eason's remarks, and there is no transcript or webcast. But I was in the room and Rony's account is consistent with what I heard. The way to resolve this controversy would be to check a transcript or video recording of the event. It shouldn't be too hard to figure out whether Mr. Eason said that the U.S. military was deliberately killing journalists, or whether, as CNN insists, it was a misunderstanding. We have talked to a CNN representative who has promised to point us to a transcript or video should one surface. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Crazy Are They?:
» Get The Fuck Out Of My Country from Ace of Spades HQ Tracked on February 2, 2005 02:21 AM
» When “I know” means “well...I sorta, like, heard” from JackLewis.net Tracked on February 2, 2005 08:56 AM
» First dolls, now reporters from Posse Incitatus Tracked on February 2, 2005 09:32 AM
» Liberal Media Making An Appearance from Grooveswitch -- Red Sox Fan, Patriots Fan and a Conservative Tracked on February 2, 2005 05:26 PM
» Benedict Jordan from Dean's Journal Tracked on February 3, 2005 12:00 AM
» Eason Jordan and the names of 12 journalists "deliberately targeted" by US troops from Resonant Information There's been a small storm of protest over CNN chief news executive Eason Jordan accusing the US military not only of killing 12 journalists, but doing it deliberately. That's the kind of statement that really requires a bit of preparation, so it's qu [Read More]Tracked on February 3, 2005 01:40 AM
» The Latest Media Scandal from HobbsOnline Tracked on February 3, 2005 09:49 AM
» The Week in Blog: February 7, 2005 from The Truth Laid Bear Tracked on February 7, 2005 08:01 AM
» The Week in Blog: February 7, 2005 from The Truth Laid Bear Tracked on February 7, 2005 08:02 AM
» How Crazy Are They? from MyFreePress.com Tracked on February 7, 2005 01:51 PM
» Don't go Easy on Jordan from Think Sink Tracked on February 8, 2005 09:39 PM
» Blogosphere Flexes Its Muscles Again... CNN's Eason Jordan Resigns from Coro Blog Tracked on February 14, 2005 11:54 PM |