![]() |
|
February 12, 2005
A basic assumption of American liberalism is that the United Nations occupies a higher moral plane than the United States. Thus, actions taken under the U.N.'s auspices are automatically vested with more moral authority than those taken unilaterally by the U.S. And liberals take seriously hectoring of the U.S. by lightweights like Kofi Annan. Like so much of the liberal catechism, this belief rests on no evident empirical foundation. As we were reminded again by Tim Blair, who noted this Reuters story: UN peacekeepers have been banned from all sex with the local population in Congo because of widespread, continuing abuse of women and girls. In the past year the UN investigated 150 allegations against 50 soldiers of sexual exploitation of women and girls. In most parts of the world, people do consider that line a fine one. What I don't understand is why we should be taking moral instruction from them. UPDATE: Michelle Malkin has much, much more. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Moral Guidance From the U.N.:
» Schlorff launches a blog from Transatlantic Zeppelin Tracked on February 12, 2005 05:00 PM
» Your U.N. at work from W.C. Varones Blog Tracked on February 12, 2005 05:32 PM
» un: sex-for-food from evolution Tracked on February 12, 2005 11:08 PM
» Miscellanea - How I Learned to Stop Worrying... from Decision '08 Tracked on February 13, 2005 01:18 AM
» Conservative Values from PBS Watch Tracked on February 13, 2005 02:40 PM |