![]() |
|
October 31, 2005
Polipundit counts the votes of 50-54 Senators in favor of Judge Alito's confirmation: "The roll call vote." But what about the votes on a cloture motion, Mr. Polipundit? How goes the gang of 14? Pending his tabulation of votes on a putative cloture motion, Polipundit directs us to Ed Whelan's ringing endorsement of Judge Alito's nomination: "Congratulations, President Bush!" Whelan writes: In selecting Third Circuit judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. for the Supreme Court, President Bush has made a truly outstanding nomination that deserves widespread acclaim. By any objective criteria, it is doubtful that there is anyone now or in recent decades (yes, not even Chief Justice Roberts) whose experience and qualifications better prepare him for the Supreme Court. JOHN adds: Alito is a solid choice. Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid have already come out against him; another good sign. I'm a little surprised to see that People for the American Way doesn't seem to have anything on Alito on their web site. PFAW has not yet reacted to the nomination. UPDATE: PFAW has now sent out a press release attacking Alito: Neas said that People For the American Way will mobilize its 750,000 members and activists to wage a massive national effort to defeat Alito’s nomination and will work closely with its coalition partners to educate Americans about the threats posed by this nomination. We're about to get the fight over Constitutional principles that conservatives have looked forward to for years. ANOTHER UPDATE: PFAW has put out a "preliminary report" on Judge Alito which you can access here. PFAW approaches Judge Alito's record with its usual balance and nuance: As the following summaries of his opinions reveal, the judicial philosophy of Samuel Alito is far to the right. In fact, he has been given the nickname “Scalito” by some who practice before him and liken him to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. ... It is clear that Alito’s confirmation would seriously jeopardize Americans’ rights. |