![]() |
|
July 30, 2006
Controversy has emerged over the collapse of the large building in Qana where several dozen civilians (most likely human shields) were killed following an Israeli air strike. The controversy relates to the timing of the collapse. The airstrike was not long after midnight, whereas the IAF has said that the building apparently did not collapse until around 8 a.m. (See update to Qana post below.) Some news accounts are simply assuming that the collapse was immediate. See, for example, the beginning of this story in the New York Times: It was pitch black when the missiles came to this small mountain village. The children were asleep. Suddenly, a roof and a second floor were punched in on top of them. Dirt was forced into mouths. Bodies were broken. It's possible that the Times knows something the rest of us don't, but, knowing what we do about the Times, that is extremely unlikely. The most up-do-date account of the controversy I've seen comes from this recently-posted article in Haaretz: The Israel Defense Forces convened a press conference Sunday evening, admitting that while the IAF did indeed strike the building in which the civilians were killed, the attack itself occurred near midnight, while reports of an explosion and the structure's collapse were only received at around 8:30 A.M. It isn't clear at this point whether the IAF has reason to think that the collapse occurred around 8:00 a.m., or has only noted that it was first reported then. Nor have the IAF's videos of the strikes, which may or may not resolve the question, been made public. |