![]() |
|
August 06, 2006
The U.S. and France have agreed on a joing proposal for a U.N. Security Council resolution to end the fighting in Lebanon. The proposal will be taken up by the U.N. next week. In the meantime, the government of Lebanon has rejected the American/French proposal on the ground that it is "biased" in favor of Israel, in part because it calls for an immediate cease-fire, it does not require the immediate withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon. [Via Power Line News.] I don't think the draft proposal has been made public, but Blog of the Week Vital Perspective has obtained a copy. You can read the full text here. From my review, it appears that Ambassador John Bolton and his staff did an excellent job of conditioning a cease-fire on meaningful progress toward a long-term solution to the problem of Hezbollah. In particular, I suspect that the following paragraphs will make it difficult for Hezbollah to accept the resolution: 6. Calls for Israel and Lebanon to support a permanent ceasefire and a long-term solution based on the following principles and elements:Those terms, if implemented successfully, would put Hezbollah out of business. |