![]() |
|
September 21, 2006
At his Big Question blog at the Star Tribune site, reporter Eric Black interviews Rob Daves of the Star Tribune Minnesota Poll. I interviewed Daves in 2000 and 2002 regarding the Minnesota Poll. Following the Coleman-Mondale Senate election in 2002, I wrote a column incorporating my interviews with Daves and commenting on the discrepancy between the final published Star Tribune Minnesota Poll and election results: "The trouble with the Star Trib poll." Daves explains the mysteriously appearing Republican voters that traditionally make it to the polls in defiance of the Star Tribune's final published pre-election polls as an empirically verifiable closing "Republican surge." For some reason, it is a "surge" that generally is not demonstrated by polls other than the Minnesota Poll. In the comments section of the Daves interview, reader Mark Liveringhouse outlines all of the Just to show you the how ridiculous it is for Rob Daves to claim that the reason for the problems in the Minnesota Poll is this mysterious REPUBLICAN surge that they have “empirical evidence” for here are some polling sequences for the state during the 2004 Presidential Election.Here is Mark's look at the results of a Minnesota exit poll for the 2004 election: Again, anyone who concludes or talks about the so called last minute surge is being ridiculous. The other polls show just the opposite, that the late undecided broke for John Kerry.In my 2002 column on the Star Tribune Minnesota Poll I concluded: If I were the editor or publisher of the Star Tribune, I would be seriously concerned about, if not mightily embarrassed by, the quality of my product. If the Star Tribune's poll product were edible instead of legible, it would long ago have been recalled as dangerous to human health, or it would have killed off its customers. We can only hope that some day the Star Tribune cares as much about the quality of its news product as McDonald's does about the quality of its hamburgers. |