![]() |
|
April 21, 2007
City Journal has posted a few of the highlights from its forthcoming Spring issue. Among them is Christopher Hitchens's engaging account of "the first overseas war that the United States ever fought." Hitchens gets off to a rousing start. He relates the wisdom dispensed by the academic historian Frank Lambert: One of the historians of the Barbary conflict, Frank Lambert, argues that the imperative of free trade drove America much more than did any quarrel with Islam or “tyranny,” let alone “terrorism.” He resists any comparison with today’s tormenting confrontations. “The Barbary Wars were primarily about trade, not theology,” he writes. “Rather than being holy wars, they were an extension of America’s War of Independence.”Hitchens then drily notes: [O]ne cannot get around what Jefferson heard when he went with John Adams to wait upon Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785. When they inquired by what right the Barbary states preyed upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers, America’s two foremost envoys were informed that “it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” (It is worth noting that the United States played no part in the Crusades, or in the Catholic reconquista of Andalusia.)Ah, the uses of history! Tell it to Bill Clinton. You gotta love that parenthetical, as well as the rest of this illuminating essay. To comment on this post, go here. |