![]() |
|
April 25, 2007
Sure they could. At his Washington Post blog The Fix, Chris Cillizza assesses the Democrats' prospects for getting to the "holy grail" of Senate control--60 seats--over the next couple of election cycles. He thinks they aren't too bad: The last time a party held 60 or more seats was three decades ago when Democrats had 61 seats in the 95th Congress (1977-1979). But, the combination of a toxic political environment for Republicans and a relatively small number of Democratic vulnerabilities has skilled observers -- including Fix friend and Roll Call columnist Stu Rothenberg -- starting to talk about the possibility of Democrats getting to 60 in the next two or four years. If present trends continue, the Republicans will indeed be in trouble in 2008, and given the seats at risk, they will likely suffer a net loss in the Senate regardless. I wonder, though, whether the voters at large are as impressed by the Democrats' obsession with investigations as those inside the Beltway seem to be. The voters want Congress to do the public's business, not engage in partisan games. I think the Democrats are at some risk that voters may conclude they are using their majorities to pursue their war against the Bush administration rather than seek legislative solutions to problems. If that happens, the atmosphere in 2008 may not be as bad for Republicans as many now believe. Still, right now the odds don't look good. To comment on this post, go here. |