Power Line Blog
June 17, 2007
What about the gang of 88?

As John notes below, the organized bar of North Carolina has roused itself to administer justice to Durham Country District Attorney Michael Nifong. In disbarring him, the disciplinary committee imposed the maximum punishment available. Disbarment is the professional equivalent of capital punishment. Professor K.C. Johnson has been the indispensable chronicler of the case at Durham-in-Wonderland. Professor Johnson concludes his Sunday roundup on the disciplinary proceeding with the statement of Steven Michael, the president of the North Carolina state bar:

In my experience, misconduct of the sort Mr. Nifong engaged in is very rare and not at all typical of prosecutors in our state. We deeply regret the serious harm caused to these young men and their families. We hope the decision today will lessen the likelihood that anything like this will happen again.

The Bar’s strong response to this situation made clear that the ethical rules restricting pretrial public comment and requiring prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence will be strictly enforced. Those rules are important because they ensure the fundamental right to a fair trial that every citizen is guaranteed in our constitution.

And yet Nifong's misconduct was not the only professional misconduct that occurred in connection with the case. Who can forget Duke's Gang of 88 radical professors that supported the on-campus lynch mob that issued "wanted" posters of the lacrosse players? In good postmodern style, the Gang of 88 has attempted to put its past under erasure (Professor Johnson commented here), but Duke students who exceed the Gang in maturity and responsibility remember. When he checked in with one member of the Gang of 88 last fall, Professor Johnson reported:
I e-mailed Professor Curtis last week, to ask if in light of the many facts that have emerged since April 6 she entertained any second thoughts about signing the Group of 88's statement. I also asked if she had considered making a public statement supporting due process for the accused students.

She did not reply.

It is a remarkable fact of the Duke case that the legal profession has acquitted itself with greater honor than the professoriate.

To comment on this post, go here.

Posted by Scott at 07:08 AM  |  E-mail this post to a friend  |  


Customize

Default font size    Large font size    Larger font size

Click an option above to increase/decrease Power Line's font size.



Search


Archives
By Author:

John Hinderaker
Scott Johnson
Paul Mirengoff


By Month:


Old Archives:


Podcasts

RSS Feed
Archive


Links

Some of Our Favorites:

Armavirumque
Austin Bay
Barone Blog
Belmont Club
Big Lizards
Claremont Institute
Contentions
Hot Air
InstaPundit
Joe's Dartblog
Little Green Footballs
Lucianne
Michelle Malkin
No Left Turns
Real Clear Politics
Right Wing News
Roger L. Simon
Scrappleface
Tim Blair
Urgent Agenda

The Northern Alliance:

Commissioner Hugh Hewitt
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
SCSU Scholars
Shot in the Dark
CentCom (honorary)

Media:

American Spectator
Commentary
Fox News
FrontPage Magazine
MEMRI
National Review Online
OpinionJournal
SteynOnline
Townhall
Weekly Standard






Credits
Powered by Movable Type
Site design by Sekimori





Site Meter