![]() |
|
July 13, 2007
In the video above, Hoover Institution Fellow Peter Robinson interviews Andrew Ferguson about his new book Land of Lincoln: Travels in Abe's America, which we wrote about here and here. The interview ends on a high note. If you are interested, don't quit before the last few mintutes. The actor Hal Holbrook originally became famous impersonating Mark Twain in "Mark Twain Tonight." Ferguson devotes a funny section of the book to Lincoln impersonators. Watching Ferguson, both on the video and when he spoke in Minneapolis last month, I thought he could make a living as a successor to Hal Holbrook and I wondered what Mark Twain thought of Lincoln. At Carnegie Hall on February 12, 1901, Twain recalled: The hearts of this whole nation, North and South, were in the war. We of the South were not ashamed of the part we took. We believed in those days we were fighting for the right - and it was a noble fight, for we were fighting for our sweethearts, our homes, and our lives. Today we no longer regret the result, today we are glad that it came out as it did, but we of the South are not ashamed that we made an endeavor. And you, too, are proud of the record we made.In 1907 Twain wrote in support of making the Lincoln Birthplace Farm a national park: There is a natural human instinct that is gratified by the sight of anything hallowed by association with a great man or with great deeds. So many people make pilgrimages to the town whose streets were once trodden by Shakespeare, and Hartford guarded her Charter Oak for centuries because it had once had a hole in it that helped to save the liberties of a Colony. But in most cases the connection between the great man or the great event and the relic we revere is accidental. Shakespeare might have lived in any other town as well as in Stratford, and Connecticut's charter might have been hidden in a woodchuck hole as well as in the Charter Oak. But it was no accident that planted Lincoln on a Kentucky farm, half way between the lakes and the Gulf. The association there had substance in it. Lincoln belonged just where he was put. If the Union was to be saved, it had to be a man of such an origin that should save it. No wintry New England Brahmin could have done it, or any torrid cotton planter, regarding the distant Yankee as a species of obnoxious foreigner. It needed a man of the border, where civil war meant the grapple of brother and brother and disunion a raw and gaping wound. It needed one who knew slavery not from books only, but as a living thing, knew the good that was mixed with its evil, and knew the evil not merely as it affected the negroes, but in its hardly less baneful influence upon the poor whites. It needed one who knew how human all the parties to the quarrel were, how much alike they were at bottom, who saw them all reflected in himself, and felt their dissensions like the tearing apart of his own soul. When the war came Georgia sent an army in gray and Massachusetts an army in blue, but Kentucky raised armies for both sides. And this man, sprung from Southern poor whites, born on a Kentucky farm and transplanted to an Illinois village, this man, in whose heart knowledge and charity had left no room for malice, was marked by Providence as the one to "bind up the Nation's wounds." His birthplace is worth saving.From Twain to Ferguson is not (to borrow Lena's words in Faulkner's Light in August) a fur piece. To comment on this post, go here. |