In the post below, I argue that the quality of a Supreme Court nominee’s law school is irrelevant when it comes to assessing his or her qualifications. In my opinion, however, prior judicial experience is quite relevant. To some extent, this a just common sense. Prior experience doing the same work is universally considered important for almost every job that requires skill. I made a more nuanced argument on this matter here, in a piece for the Daily Standard.
It’s important to note, however, that while prior judicial experience is a valuable qualification, its absence doesn’t necessarily make a nominee unqualified.
-
Donate to PL
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish Review of Books
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media