Sexual politics
May 8, 2007
Posted by Paul at 12:12 PM
The Washington Post reports that the Hillary Clinton camp is rejecting any suggestion that Segolene Royal's defeat has any implications for Clinton's prospects to become our first female president. As I argued yesterday, Hillary's camp is probably right. Clinton is the anti-Segolene.
It's possible she may pay a price for tilting so far to the other extreme, and that the price may have a gender-based component. But that remains to be seen.
